Radeon R7 M260 Rev. 2 vs Radeon HD 4860
Summary
Radeon R7 M260 Rev. 2
100%
Radeon HD 4860
106%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 M260 Rev. 2 |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Mantle |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 4860 |
Around 6% higher average synthetic performance. |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 4860
The Radeon HD 4860 is the better performing card based on the synthetic benchmarks used (1 benchmarks).
Core Configuration
| Radeon R7 M260 Rev. 2 | | Radeon HD 4860 | |
---|
GPU Name | Opal (Opal PRO) | vs | RV790 (RV790 GT) |
Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 55 nm |
Die Size | 77 mm² | vs | 282 mm² |
Transistors | 1,040 million | vs | 959 million |
Shaders | 384 | vs | 640 |
Compute Units | 6 | vs | 8 |
Core clock | 620 MHz | vs | 700 MHz |
ROPs | 8 | vs | 16 |
TMUs | 24 | vs | 32 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon R7 M260 Rev. 2 | | Radeon HD 4860 | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 256 bit |
Memory Speed | 1000 MHz
4000 MHz effective | vs | 750 MHz
3000 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon R7 M260 Rev. 2 | | Radeon HD 4860 | |
---|
TDP | 0 watts | vs | 130 watts |
Release Date | 6 Dec 2015 | vs | 9 Sep 2009 |
Radeon R7 M260 Rev. 2
5.72 GP/s
Radeon HD 4860
11.20 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon R7 M260 Rev. 2
17.16 GT/s
Radeon HD 4860
22.40 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon R7 M260 Rev. 2
64.00 GB/s
Radeon HD 4860
96.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon R7 M260 Rev. 2
549.10 GFLOPs
Radeon HD 4860
896.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
Radeon R7 M260 Rev. 2
1880
Radeon HD 4860
2000
Points (higher is better)