Radeon R7 M260 vs Radeon HD 4850
Summary
Radeon R7 M260
100%
Radeon HD 4850
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 M260 |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Mantle |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 4850 |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Radeon R7 M260 | | Radeon HD 4850 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Topaz (Topaz XT) | vs | RV770 (RV770 PRO) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 55 nm |
| Die Size | 77 mm² | vs | 256 mm² |
| Transistors | unknown | vs | 956 million |
| Shaders | 384 | vs | 800 |
| Compute Units | 6 | vs | 10 |
| Core clock | 940 MHz | vs | 625 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | vs | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | vs | 40 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon R7 M260 | | Radeon HD 4850 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 256 bit |
| Memory Speed | 900 MHz
3600 MHz effective | vs | 993 MHz
1986 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon R7 M260 | | Radeon HD 4850 | |
|---|
| TDP | 0 watts | vs | 110 watts |
| Release Date | 11 Jun 2014 | vs | 25 Jun 2008 |
Radeon R7 M260
7.52 GP/s
Radeon HD 4850
10.00 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon R7 M260
22.56 GT/s
Radeon HD 4850
25.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon R7 M260
57.60 GB/s
Radeon HD 4850
63.60 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon R7 M260
721.90 GFLOPs
Radeon HD 4850
1000.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
Radeon R7 M260
1880
Radeon HD 4850
1890
Points (higher is better)