Radeon R7 M260 vs Radeon HD 6750
Summary
Radeon R7 M260
100%
Radeon HD 6750
109%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 M260 |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Mantle |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6750 |
| Around 9% higher average synthetic performance. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 6750
The Radeon HD 6750 is the better performing card based on the synthetic benchmarks used (1 benchmarks).
Core Configuration
| Radeon R7 M260 | | Radeon HD 6750 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Topaz (Topaz XT) | vs | Juniper (Juniper PRO) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 77 mm² | vs | 166 mm² |
| Transistors | unknown | vs | 1,040 million |
| Shaders | 384 | vs | 720 |
| Compute Units | 6 | vs | 9 |
| Core clock | 940 MHz | vs | 700 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | vs | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | vs | 36 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon R7 M260 | | Radeon HD 6750 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 900 MHz
3600 MHz effective | vs | 1150 MHz
4600 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon R7 M260 | | Radeon HD 6750 | |
|---|
| TDP | 0 watts | vs | 86 watts |
| Release Date | 11 Jun 2014 | vs | 21 Jan 2011 |
Radeon R7 M260
7.52 GP/s
Radeon HD 6750
11.20 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon R7 M260
22.56 GT/s
Radeon HD 6750
25.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon R7 M260
57.60 GB/s
Radeon HD 6750
73.60 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon R7 M260
721.90 GFLOPs
Radeon HD 6750
1008.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
Radeon R7 M260
1880
Radeon HD 6750
2050
Points (higher is better)