Radeon R9 285X vs GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal)
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon R9 285X |
50 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal) . |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports FreeSync |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports TrueAudio |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal) |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal)
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon R9 285X | | GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal) | |
---|
GPU Name | Tonga (Tonga XT) | vs | GP102 (GP102) |
Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 16 nm |
Die Size | 366 mm² | vs | 471 mm² |
Transistors | 5,000 million | vs | 12,000 million |
Shaders | 2048 | vs | 3584 |
Compute Units | 32 | vs | 28 |
Core clock | 1002 MHz | vs | 1417 MHz |
ROPs | 32 | vs | 96 |
TMUs | 128 | vs | 224 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon R9 285X | | GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal) | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5X |
Bus Width | 384 bit | vs | 384 bit |
Memory Speed | 1375 MHz
5500 MHz effective | vs | 1251 MHz
10008 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 3072 Mb | vs | 12288 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon R9 285X | | GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal) | |
---|
TDP | 200 watts | vs | 250 watts |
Release Date | UNRELEASED | vs | 2 Aug 2016 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better