Radeon R9 M365X vs Radeon E8870

Radeon R9 M365X
Memory: 4096Mb GDDR5MOBILE
Release date: 5 May 2015
Radeon R9 M365X
Radeon E8870
Memory: 4096Mb GDDR5MOBILE
Release date: 29 Sep 2015
Radeon E8870

Summary

Reasons to consider Radeon R9 M365X

Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Mantle
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Reasons to consider Radeon E8870

Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports FreeSync
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports TrueAudio
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Radeon E8870

HWBench recommends Radeon E8870

Based on theoretical specifications.


Specifications

Core Configuration

Radeon R9 M365XRadeon E8870
GPU NameTropo (Tropo XT)vsSaturn (Saturn PRO)
Fab Process28 nmvs28 nm
Die Size123 mm²vs160 mm²
Transistors1,500 millionvs2,080 million
Shaders640vs768
Compute Units10vs12
Core clock900 MHzvs1000 MHz
ROPs16vs16
TMUs40vs48

Memory Configuration

Radeon R9 M365XRadeon E8870
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Bus Width128 bitvs128 bit
Memory Speed1125 MHz
4500 MHz effective
vs1500 MHz
6000 MHz effective
Memory Size4096 Mbvs4096 Mb

Additional details

Radeon R9 M365XRadeon E8870
TDP0 wattsvs75 watts
Release Date5 May 2015vs29 Sep 2015

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • Radeon R9 M365X
    14.80 GP/s
  • Radeon E8870
    16.00 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • Radeon R9 M365X
    37.00 GT/s
  • Radeon E8870
    48.00 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • Radeon R9 M365X
    72.00 GB/s
  • Radeon E8870
    96.00 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • Radeon R9 M365X
    1184.00 GFLOPs
  • Radeon E8870
    1536.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better

Similar comparisons