Radeon RX 590 vs Radeon R9 Nano
Summary
Radeon RX 590
125%
Radeon R9 Nano
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider Radeon RX 590 |
25% higher gaming performance. |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports FreeSync |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports TrueAudio |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R9 Nano |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports FreeSync |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports TrueAudio |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon RX 590
The Radeon RX 590 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (15 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
| Radeon RX 590 | | Radeon R9 Nano | |
---|
GPU Name | Polaris 30 (Polaris 30 XTX) | vs | Fiji (Fiji XT CA) |
Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Die Size | 244 mm² | vs | 596 mm² |
Transistors | 5,700 million | vs | 8,900 million |
Shaders | 2304 | vs | 4096 |
Compute Units | 36 | vs | 64 |
Core clock | 1257 MHz | vs | 1000 MHz |
ROPs | 32 | vs | 64 |
TMUs | 144 | vs | 256 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon RX 590 | | Radeon R9 Nano | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | HBM |
Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 4096 bit |
Memory Speed | 2000 MHz
8000 MHz effective | vs | 500 MHz
1000 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 8192 Mb | vs | 4096 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon RX 590 | | Radeon R9 Nano | |
---|
TDP | 0 watts | vs | 175 watts |
Release Date | UNRELEASED | vs | 27 Aug 2015 |
Radeon RX 590
49.44 GP/s
Radeon R9 Nano
64.00 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon RX 590
222.50 GT/s
Radeon R9 Nano
256.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon RX 590
256.00 GB/s
Radeon R9 Nano
512.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon RX 590
7119.00 GFLOPs
Radeon R9 Nano
8192.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
Radeon RX 590
80
Radeon R9 Nano
46
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10x64
Radeon RX 590
46
Radeon R9 Nano
39
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
Radeon RX 590
80
Radeon R9 Nano
55
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
Radeon RX 590
63
Radeon R9 Nano
50
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64
Radeon RX 590
90
Radeon R9 Nano
93
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
Radeon RX 590
59
Radeon R9 Nano
37
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10x64
Radeon RX 590
34
Radeon R9 Nano
29
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
Radeon RX 590
52
Radeon R9 Nano
39
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
Radeon RX 590
43
Radeon R9 Nano
35
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64
Radeon RX 590
64
Radeon R9 Nano
69
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
Radeon RX 590
33
Radeon R9 Nano
26
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10x64
Radeon RX 590
19
Radeon R9 Nano
17
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
Radeon RX 590
29
Radeon R9 Nano
21
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
Radeon RX 590
21
Radeon R9 Nano
16
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64
Radeon RX 590
38
Radeon R9 Nano
45
FPS (higher is better)