Radeon RX 6500 XT vs GeForce RTX 2050

Radeon RX 6500 XT
Memory: 4096Mb GDDR6DESKTOP
Release date: 19 Jan 2022
Radeon RX 6500 XT
GeForce RTX 2050
Memory: 4096Mb GDDR6DESKTOP
Release date: UNRELEASED
GeForce RTX 2050

Summary

Reasons to consider Radeon RX 6500 XT

Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports FreeSync
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Infinity Cache allows to deliver up to 3.25x the effective memory bandwidth
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR)

Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 2050

Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR)
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS)

GeForce RTX 2050

HWBench recommends GeForce RTX 2050

Based on theoretical specifications.


Specifications

Core Configuration

Radeon RX 6500 XTGeForce RTX 2050
GPU NameNavi 24 (Navi 24 XT)vsTU107 (TU107)
Fab Process6 nmvs12 nm
Die Size107 mm²vs0 mm²
Transistors5,400 millionvsunknown
Shaders1024vs896
Compute Units16vs14
Core clock2200 MHzvs1515 MHz
ROPs32vs32
TMUs64vs56

Memory Configuration

Radeon RX 6500 XTGeForce RTX 2050
Memory TypeGDDR6vsGDDR6
Bus Width64 bitvs128 bit
Memory Speed2250 MHz
18 Gbps effective
vs1750 MHz
14000 MHz effective
Memory Size4096 Mbvs4096 Mb

Additional details

Radeon RX 6500 XTGeForce RTX 2050
TDP107 wattsvs120 watts
Release Date19 Jan 2022vsUNRELEASED

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • Radeon RX 6500 XT
    90.08 GP/s
  • GeForce RTX 2050
    54.24 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • Radeon RX 6500 XT
    180.20 GT/s
  • GeForce RTX 2050
    94.92 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • Radeon RX 6500 XT
    144.00 GB/s
  • GeForce RTX 2050
    224.00 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • Radeon RX 6500 XT
    5765.00 GFLOPs
  • GeForce RTX 2050
    3037.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better