Radeon RX 6700 XT vs GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon RX 6700 XT |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports FreeSync |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Infinity Cache allows to deliver up to 3.25x the effective memory bandwidth |
| Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon RX 6700 XT
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon RX 6700 XT | | GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Navi 22 (Navi 22 XT) | vs | GP106 (GP106-300-A1) |
| Fab Process | 7 nm | vs | 16 nm |
| Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 200 mm² |
| Transistors | unknown | vs | 4,400 million |
| Shaders | 2560 | vs | 1152 |
| Compute Units | 40 | vs | 9 |
| Core clock | 1489 MHz | vs | 1506 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | vs | 48 |
| TMUs | 192 | vs | 72 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon RX 6700 XT | | GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192 bit | vs | 192 bit |
| Memory Speed | 2000 MHz
16 Gbps effective | vs | 2002 MHz
8008 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 12288 Mb | vs | 3072 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon RX 6700 XT | | GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | |
|---|
| TDP | 150 watts | vs | 120 watts |
| Release Date | UNRELEASED | vs | 18 Aug 2016 |
Radeon RX 6700 XT
128.00 GP/s
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
72.30 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon RX 6700 XT
384.00 GT/s
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
108.40 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon RX 6700 XT
384.00 GB/s
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
192.20 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon RX 6700 XT
10240.00 GFLOPs
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
3470.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better