Radeon RX 6750 XT vs Radeon RX Vega 56

Radeon RX 6750 XT
Memory: 12288Mb GDDR6DESKTOP
Release date: 3 Mar 2022
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX Vega 56
Memory: 8192Mb HBM2DESKTOP
Release date: 8 Aug 2017
Radeon RX Vega 56

Summary

Gaming performance index

  • Radeon RX 6750 XT
    210%
  • Radeon RX Vega 56
    100%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider Radeon RX 6750 XT

110% higher gaming performance.
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports FreeSync
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Infinity Cache allows to deliver up to 3.25x the effective memory bandwidth
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR)

Reasons to consider Radeon RX Vega 56

40 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon RX 6750 XT .
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports FreeSync
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports TrueAudio
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Radeon RX 6750 XT

HWBench recommends Radeon RX 6750 XT

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (10 combinations of games and resolutions).


Specifications

Core Configuration

Radeon RX 6750 XTRadeon RX Vega 56
GPU NameNavi 22 (Navi 22 KXT (215-127000144))vsVega 10 (Vega 10 XL)
Fab Process7 nmvs14 nm
Die Size335 mm²vs484 mm²
Transistors17,200 millionvs12,500 million
Shaders2560vs3584
Raytracing Cores40vsnone
Compute Units40vs56
Core clock2200 MHzvs1156 MHz
ROPs64vs64
TMUs160vs224

Memory Configuration

Radeon RX 6750 XTRadeon RX Vega 56
Memory TypeGDDR6vsHBM2
Bus Width192 bitvs2048 bit
Memory Speed2250 MHz
18 Gbps effective
vs800 MHz
1600 MHz effective
Memory Size12288 Mbvs8192 Mb

Additional details

Radeon RX 6750 XTRadeon RX Vega 56
TDP250 wattsvs210 watts
Release Date3 Mar 2022vs8 Aug 2017

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • Radeon RX 6750 XT
    166.40 GP/s
  • Radeon RX Vega 56
    94.14 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • Radeon RX 6750 XT
    416.00 GT/s
  • Radeon RX Vega 56
    329.50 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • Radeon RX 6750 XT
    432.00 GB/s
  • Radeon RX Vega 56
    409.60 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • Radeon RX 6750 XT
    13310.00 GFLOPs
  • Radeon RX Vega 56
    10544.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better

Game benchmarks

Assassins Creed: Valhalla

Ultra quality - DirectX12 Windows 11

  • Radeon RX 6750 XT
    140
  • Radeon RX Vega 56
    57

FPS (higher is better)

Hitman III

Ultra quality - DirectX12 Windows 11

  • Radeon RX 6750 XT
    264
  • Radeon RX Vega 56
    139

FPS (higher is better)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64

  • Radeon RX 6750 XT
    226
  • Radeon RX Vega 56
    81

FPS (higher is better)

Assassins Creed: Valhalla

Ultra quality - DirectX12 Windows 11

  • Radeon RX 6750 XT
    97
  • Radeon RX Vega 56
    45

FPS (higher is better)

Hitman III

Ultra quality - DirectX12 Windows 11

  • Radeon RX 6750 XT
    170
  • Radeon RX Vega 56
    88

FPS (higher is better)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64

  • Radeon RX 6750 XT
    125
  • Radeon RX Vega 56
    54

FPS (higher is better)

Assassins Creed: Valhalla

Ultra quality - DirectX12 Windows 11

  • Radeon RX 6750 XT
    51
  • Radeon RX Vega 56
    27

FPS (higher is better)

Hitman III

Ultra quality - DirectX12 Windows 11

  • Radeon RX 6750 XT
    88
  • Radeon RX Vega 56
    48

FPS (higher is better)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64

  • Radeon RX 6750 XT
    62
  • Radeon RX Vega 56
    28

FPS (higher is better)

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

  • Radeon RX 6750 XT
    63
  • Radeon RX Vega 56
    39

FPS (higher is better)