Radeon RX 7900 XT vs GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Summary
Radeon RX 7900 XT
117%
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider Radeon RX 7900 XT |
17% higher gaming performance. |
150 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti . |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
HWBench recommends Radeon RX 7900 XT
The Radeon RX 7900 XT is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (18 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | |
---|
GPU Name | Navi 31 (Navi 31 XT) | vs | GA102 (GA102-350-A1) |
Fab Process | 5 nm | vs | 8 nm |
Die Size | 350 mm² | vs | 628 mm² |
Transistors | unknown | vs | 28,300 million |
Shaders | 12288 | vs | 10752 |
Tensor Cores | none | vs | 336 |
Raytracing Cores | 192 | vs | 84 |
Compute Units | 192 | vs | 84 |
Core clock | 2500 MHz | vs | 1560 MHz |
ROPs | 256 | vs | 112 |
TMUs | 768 | vs | 336 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | GDDR6X |
Bus Width | 384 bit | vs | 384 bit |
Memory Speed | 2250 MHz
18 Gbps effective | vs | 1313 MHz
21 Gbps effective |
Memory Size | 24576 Mb | vs | 24576 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | |
---|
TDP | 300 watts | vs | 450 watts |
Release Date | 3 Nov 2022 | vs | 27 Jan 2022 |
Radeon RX 7900 XT
691.20 GP/s
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
208.30 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon RX 7900 XT
2074.00 GT/s
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
625.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon RX 7900 XT
864.00 GB/s
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
1008.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon RX 7900 XT
66360.00 GFLOPs
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
40000.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
Ultra quality - DirectX12 Windows 11
Radeon RX 7900 XT
197
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
133
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality - DirectX12 Windows 11
Radeon RX 7900 XT
182
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
175
FPS (higher is better)
Extreme Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
Radeon RX 7900 XT
157
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
125
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality - DirectX12 Windows 11
Radeon RX 7900 XT
409
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
333
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
Radeon RX 7900 XT
273
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
276
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
Radeon RX 7900 XT
320
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
299
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality - DirectX12 Windows 11
Radeon RX 7900 XT
151
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
112
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality - DirectX12 Windows 11
Radeon RX 7900 XT
172
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
144
FPS (higher is better)
Extreme Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
Radeon RX 7900 XT
141
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
113
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality - DirectX12 Windows 11
Radeon RX 7900 XT
306
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
236
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
Radeon RX 7900 XT
199
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
208
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
Radeon RX 7900 XT
235
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
228
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality - DirectX12 Windows 11
Radeon RX 7900 XT
98
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
72
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality - DirectX12 Windows 11
Radeon RX 7900 XT
108
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
89
FPS (higher is better)
Extreme Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
Radeon RX 7900 XT
108
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
88
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality - DirectX12 Windows 11
Radeon RX 7900 XT
172
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
142
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
Radeon RX 7900 XT
113
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
114
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
Radeon RX 7900 XT
126
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
133
FPS (higher is better)