Radeon X1050 vs Radeon HD 5770
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon X1050 |
| 84 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 5770 . |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 5770 |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 5770
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon X1050 | | Radeon HD 5770 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | RV410 () | vs | Juniper (Juniper XT) |
| Fab Process | 110 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 156 mm² | vs | 166 mm² |
| Transistors | 120 million | vs | 1,040 million |
| Shaders | 0 | vs | 800 |
| Compute Units | 0 | vs | 10 |
| Core clock | 400 MHz | vs | 850 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | vs | 16 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 40 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon X1050 | | Radeon HD 5770 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 200 MHz
400 MHz effective | vs | 1200 MHz
4800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 128 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon X1050 | | Radeon HD 5770 | |
|---|
| TDP | 24 watts | vs | 108 watts |
| Release Date | 25 Jan 2008 | vs | 13 Oct 2009 |
Radeon X1050
3.20 GP/s
Radeon HD 5770
13.60 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon X1050
3.20 GT/s
Radeon HD 5770
34.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon X1050
3.20 GB/s
Radeon HD 5770
76.80 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon X1050
1.00 GFLOPs
Radeon HD 5770
1360.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better