GeForce 920MX vs Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce 920MX |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310) |
HWBench recommends GeForce 920MX
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce 920MX | | Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310) | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GM108 (N16V-GMR1-S) | vs | Mullins () |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 0 mm² |
| Transistors | unknown | vs | unknown |
| Shaders | 384 | vs | 128 |
| Compute Units | 3 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 1072 MHz | vs | 800 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 24 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce 920MX | | Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310) | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | System Shared |
| Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | System Shared |
| Memory Speed | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective | vs | System Shared |
| Memory Size | 2048 Mb | vs | 0 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce 920MX | | Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310) | |
|---|
| TDP | 16 watts | vs | 15 watts |
| Release Date | 1 Mar 2016 | vs | 11 Jun 2014 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better