GeForce GTS 250 vs GeForce 210
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTS 250 |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider GeForce 210 |
119 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTS 250 . |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTS 250
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTS 250 | | GeForce 210 | |
---|
GPU Name | G92B (G92-428-B1) | vs | GT218 (GT218-300-B1) |
Fab Process | 55 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 260 mm² | vs | 57 mm² |
Transistors | 754 million | vs | 260 million |
Shaders | 128 | vs | 16 |
Compute Units | 8 | vs | 2 |
Core clock | 702 MHz | vs | 520 MHz |
ROPs | 16 | vs | 4 |
TMUs | 64 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTS 250 | | GeForce 210 | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR3 | vs | DDR3 |
Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 64 bit |
Memory Speed | 1000 MHz
2000 MHz effective | vs | 400 MHz
800 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTS 250 | | GeForce 210 | |
---|
TDP | 150 watts | vs | 31 watts |
Release Date | 4 Mar 2009 | vs | 12 Oct 2009 |
GeForce GTS 250
11.20 GP/s
GeForce 210
2.08 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GTS 250
44.90 GT/s
GeForce 210
4.16 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GTS 250
64.00 GB/s
GeForce 210
6.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GTS 250
387.10 GFLOPs
GeForce 210
39.36 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better