GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
| Around 75% higher average synthetic performance. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition |
| 50 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 780 Ti . |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Mantle |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 780 Ti
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is the better performing card based on the synthetic benchmarks used (1 benchmarks).
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | | Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GK110B (GK110-425-B1) | vs | Tahiti (Tahiti PRO) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 561 mm² | vs | 352 mm² |
| Transistors | 7,080 million | vs | 4,313 million |
| Shaders | 2880 | vs | 1792 |
| Compute Units | 15 | vs | 28 |
| Core clock | 875 MHz | vs | 800 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | vs | 32 |
| TMUs | 240 | vs | 112 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | | Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 384 bit | vs | 384 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1750 MHz
7000 MHz effective | vs | 1250 MHz
5000 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 3072 Mb | vs | 3072 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | | Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition | |
|---|
| TDP | 250 watts | vs | 200 watts |
| Release Date | 7 Nov 2013 | vs | 7 Mar 2013 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better
Points (higher is better)