Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce GT 140 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
| 90 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GT 140 OEM . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 140 OEM |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | | GeForce GT 140 OEM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Broadwell GT3e () | vs | G94B () |
| Fab Process | 14 nm | vs | 55 nm |
| Die Size | 49 mm² | vs | 196 mm² |
| Transistors | 189 million | vs | 505 million |
| Shaders | 384 | vs | 64 |
| Compute Units | 0 | vs | 4 |
| Core clock | 300 MHz | vs | 650 MHz |
| ROPs | 6 | vs | 16 |
| TMUs | 48 | vs | 32 |
Memory Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | | GeForce GT 140 OEM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 256 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | | GeForce GT 140 OEM | |
|---|
| TDP | 15 watts | vs | 105 watts |
| Release Date | 5 Sep 2014 | vs | 10 Mar 2009 |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
1.80 GP/s
GeForce GT 140 OEM
10.40 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
14.40 GT/s
GeForce GT 140 OEM
20.80 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
0.00 GB/s
GeForce GT 140 OEM
57.60 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
230.40 GFLOPs
GeForce GT 140 OEM
208.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better