Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce GTX 460

Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 5 Sep 2014
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GeForce GTX 460
Memory: 1024Mb GDDR5DESKTOP
Release date: 12 Jul 2010
GeForce GTX 460

Summary

Reasons to consider Iris Pro Graphics 6200

145 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 460 .
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 460

Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.
Supports PhysX.
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications.

GeForce GTX 460

HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 460

Based on theoretical specifications.


Specifications

Core Configuration

Iris Pro Graphics 6200GeForce GTX 460
GPU NameBroadwell GT3e ()vsGF104 (GF104-300-KB-A1)
Fab Process14 nmvs40 nm
Die Size49 mm²vs332 mm²
Transistors189 millionvs1,950 million
Shaders384vs336
Compute Units0vs7
Core clock300 MHzvs675 MHz
ROPs6vs32
TMUs48vs56

Memory Configuration

Iris Pro Graphics 6200GeForce GTX 460
Memory TypeSystem SharedvsGDDR5
Bus WidthSystem Sharedvs256 bit
Memory SpeedSystem Sharedvs900 MHz
3600 MHz effective
Memory Size0 Mbvs1024 Mb

Additional details

Iris Pro Graphics 6200GeForce GTX 460
TDP15 wattsvs160 watts
Release Date5 Sep 2014vs12 Jul 2010

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    1.80 GP/s
  • GeForce GTX 460
    9.45 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    14.40 GT/s
  • GeForce GTX 460
    37.80 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    0.00 GB/s
  • GeForce GTX 460
    115.00 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    230.40 GFLOPs
  • GeForce GTX 460
    907.20 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better