Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce GTX 460
Summary
Reasons to consider Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
145 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 460 . |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 460 |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports PhysX |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 460
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | | GeForce GTX 460 | |
---|
GPU Name | Broadwell GT3e () | vs | GF104 (GF104-300-KB-A1) |
Fab Process | 14 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 49 mm² | vs | 332 mm² |
Transistors | 189 million | vs | 1,950 million |
Shaders | 384 | vs | 336 |
Compute Units | 0 | vs | 7 |
Core clock | 300 MHz | vs | 675 MHz |
ROPs | 6 | vs | 32 |
TMUs | 48 | vs | 56 |
Memory Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | | GeForce GTX 460 | |
---|
Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 256 bit |
Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 900 MHz
3600 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | | GeForce GTX 460 | |
---|
TDP | 15 watts | vs | 160 watts |
Release Date | 5 Sep 2014 | vs | 12 Jul 2010 |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
1.80 GP/s
GeForce GTX 460
9.45 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
14.40 GT/s
GeForce GTX 460
37.80 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
0.00 GB/s
GeForce GTX 460
115.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
230.40 GFLOPs
GeForce GTX 460
907.20 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better