Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs HD Graphics 530 (Skylake GT2)
Summary
Reasons to consider Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Reasons to consider HD Graphics 530 (Skylake GT2) |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
HWBench recommends Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | | HD Graphics 530 (Skylake GT2) | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Broadwell GT3e () | vs | Skylake GT2 () |
| Fab Process | 14 nm | vs | 14 nm |
| Die Size | 49 mm² | vs | 49 mm² |
| Transistors | 189 million | vs | 189 million |
| Shaders | 384 | vs | 192 |
| Compute Units | 0 | vs | 0 |
| Core clock | 300 MHz | vs | 300 MHz |
| ROPs | 6 | vs | 3 |
| TMUs | 48 | vs | 24 |
Memory Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | | HD Graphics 530 (Skylake GT2) | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 0 Mb |
Additional details
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | | HD Graphics 530 (Skylake GT2) | |
|---|
| TDP | 15 watts | vs | 15 watts |
| Release Date | 5 Sep 2014 | vs | 1 Sep 2015 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better