AMD A6-9500E vs AMD E-350

AMD A6-9500E
AMD Socket AM4DESKTOP
3000 MHz / Cores: 2 / Sep 2016
AMD A6-9500E
AMD E-350
AMD Socket FT1MOBILE
1600 MHz / Cores: 2 / Jan 2011
AMD E-350

Summary

Reasons to consider AMD A6-9500E

This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).
Higher theoretical single-threaded performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture.
Higher theoretical multi-threaded performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture.
Higher overall performance, based on specifications plus core architecture.

Reasons to consider AMD E-350

47 watts lower power draw.

AMD A6-9500E

Gaming

HWBench recommends AMD A6-9500E

Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.

No winner

Productivity

No clear winner declared



Specifications

Features

AMD A6-9500EAMD E-350
MMX
3DNow!
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSE4A
AMD64
CnQ
NX bit
AMD-V

Architecture

AMD A6-9500EAMD E-350
ArchitectureAMD ExcavatorvsAMD Bobcat
MarketDesktopvsMobile
Memory SupportDDR4vsunknown
CodenameBristol RidgevsZacate
Release DateSep 2016vsJan 2011

Cores

AMD A6-9500EAMD E-350
Cores2vs2
Threads2vs2
SMPs1vs1
Integrated GraphicsRadeon R5vsRadeon HD 6310

Cache

AMD A6-9500EAMD E-350
L1 Cache128 KB (per core)vs64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache512 KB (per core)vs512 KB (per core)
L3 Cache0 KBvs0 KB

Physical

AMD A6-9500EAMD E-350
SocketAMD Socket AM4vsAMD Socket FT1
Max Case Tempunknownvsunknown
PackageuPGAvs
Die Sizeunknownvs75mm²
Process14 nmvs40 nm

Performance

AMD A6-9500EAMD E-350
Cpu Frequency3000 MHzvs1600 MHz
Turbo Clock3400 MHzvsnone
Base Clock100 MHzvs100 MHz
Voltageunknownvs1.35 V
TDP65 Wvs18 W

Raw performance index

Raw single-thread performance estimation

  • AMD A6-9500E
    2346 points
  • AMD E-350
    1600 points

Points - higher is better

Raw multi-thread performance estimation

  • AMD A6-9500E
    3601 points
  • AMD E-350
    3200 points

Points - higher is better