AMD C-30 vs AMD E1-2150

AMD C-30
AMD Socket FT1MOBILE
1200 MHz / Cores: 1 / Jan 2011
AMD C-30
AMD E1-2150
AMD Socket FT3MOBILE
1050 MHz / Cores: 2 / Feb 2014
AMD E1-2150

Summary

Reasons to consider AMD C-30

Higher theoretical single-threaded performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture.

Reasons to consider AMD E1-2150

This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).
Higher theoretical multi-threaded performance, based on specifications plus core architecture.

AMD E1-2150

Gaming

HWBench recommends AMD E1-2150

Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.

AMD E1-2150

Productivity

HWBench recommends AMD E1-2150

Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.


Specifications

Features

AMD C-30AMD E1-2150
MMX
3DNow!
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSE4A
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AVX
AES
F16C
BMI1
AMD64
CnQ
NX bit
AMD-V

Architecture

AMD C-30AMD E1-2150
ArchitectureAMD BobcatvsAMD Jaguar
MarketMobilevsMobile
Memory SupportunknownvsDDR3
CodenameOntariovsKabini
Release DateJan 2011vsFeb 2014

Cores

AMD C-30AMD E1-2150
Cores1vs2
Threads1vs2
SMPs1vs1
Integrated GraphicsRadeon HD 6250vsRadeon HD 8210

Cache

AMD C-30AMD E1-2150
L1 Cache64 KBvs128 KB (per core)
L2 Cache512 KBvs512 KB (per core)
L3 Cache0 KBvs0 KB

Physical

AMD C-30AMD E1-2150
SocketAMD Socket FT1vsAMD Socket FT3
Max Case Tempunknownvs90°C
PackagevsBGA2
Die Size75mm²vs246mm²
Process40 nmvs32 nm

Performance

AMD C-30AMD E1-2150
Cpu Frequency1200 MHzvs1050 MHz
Turbo Clocknonevsnone
Base Clock100 MHzvs100 MHz
Voltage1.35 Vvs1.475 V
TDP9 Wvs9 W

Raw performance index

Raw single-thread performance estimation

  • AMD C-30
    1200 points
  • AMD E1-2150
    1050 points

Points - higher is better

Raw multi-thread performance estimation

  • AMD C-30
    1200 points
  • AMD E1-2150
    2100 points

Points - higher is better