HWBench.com

    AMD C-50 vs AMD E1-1500

    AMD C-50
    AMD Socket FT1MOBILE
    1000 MHz / Cores: 2 / Jan 2011
    AMD C-50
    AMD E1-1500
    AMD Socket FT1DESKTOP
    1480 MHz / Cores: 2 / Jan 2013
    AMD E1-1500

    Summary

    Synthetic performance index

    • AMD C-50
      100%
    • AMD E1-1500
      141%

    Relative performance

    Single thread performance index

    • AMD C-50
      100%
    • AMD E1-1500
      140%

    Relative performance

    Multi thread performance index

    • AMD C-50
      100%
    • AMD E1-1500
      141%

    Relative performance

    Reasons to consider AMD C-50

    None

    Reasons to consider AMD E1-1500

    Much higher single threaded performance (around 40% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications.
    Much higher multi threaded performance (around 41% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking.
    This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).
    Around 41% higher average synthetic performance.
    AMD E1-1500

    Gaming

    HWBench recommends AMD E1-1500

    Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
    AMD E1-1500

    Productivity

    HWBench recommends AMD E1-1500

    Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.

    Specifications

    Features

    AMD C-50AMD E1-1500
    MMX
    3DNow!
    SSE
    SSE2
    SSE3
    SSSE3
    SSE4a
    AMD64
    PowerNow!
    NX bit
    AMD-V

    Architecture

    AMD C-50AMD E1-1500
    ArchitectureAMD BobcatvsAMD Bobcat
    MarketMobilevsDesktop
    Memory SupportunknownvsDDR3
    CodenameOntariovsZacate
    Release DateJan 2011vsJan 2013

    Cores

    AMD C-50AMD E1-1500
    Cores2vs2
    Threads2vs2
    SMPs1vs1
    Integrated GraphicsRadeon HD 6250vsRadeon HD 7310

    Cache

    AMD C-50AMD E1-1500
    L1 Cache64 KB (per core)vs64 KB (per core)
    L2 Cache512 KB (per core)vs512 KB (per core)
    L3 Cache0 KBvs0 KB

    Physical

    AMD C-50AMD E1-1500
    SocketAMD Socket FT1vsAMD Socket FT1
    Max Case Tempunknownvs100°C
    PackagevsBGA2
    Die Size75mm²vs75mm²
    Process40 nmvs40 nm

    Performance

    AMD C-50AMD E1-1500
    Cpu Frequency1000 MHzvs1480 MHz
    Turbo Clocknonevsnone
    Base Clock100 MHzvs200 MHz
    Voltage1.35 Vvs1.35 V
    TDP9 Wvs18 W

    Raw performance index

    Raw single-thread performance estimation

    • AMD C-50
      1000 points
    • AMD E1-1500
      1480 points

    Points - higher is better

    Raw multi-thread performance estimation

    • AMD C-50
      2000 points
    • AMD E1-1500
      2960 points

    Points - higher is better

    Synthetic benchmarks

    GeekBench 3 (32-bit Multi Core)

    • AMD C-50
      669
    • AMD E1-1500
      949

    points - higher is better

    GeekBench 3 (32-bit Single Core)

    • AMD C-50
      389
    • AMD E1-1500
      546

    points - higher is better

    Similar comparisons

    AMD C-50VS AMD A6-9120C SoC
    AMD C-50AMD A6-9120C SoC
    AMD C-50VS AMD E1-2150
    AMD C-50AMD E1-2150
    AMD E1-1500VS AMD A6-9220C SoC
    AMD E1-1500AMD A6-9220C SoC
    AMD E1-1500VS Intel Core M-5Y10c
    AMD E1-1500Intel Core M-5Y10c
    AMD A6-9500EVS Intel Core M-5Y31
    AMD A6-9500EIntel Core M-5Y31
    Intel Core M-5Y31VS Intel Core M-5Y51
    Intel Core M-5Y31Intel Core M-5Y51