AMD A6-9120C SoC vs AMD C-50

AMD A6-9120C SoC
AMD Socket FT4MOBILE
1600 MHz / Cores: 2 / Jan 2019
AMD A6-9120C SoC
AMD C-50
AMD Socket FT1MOBILE
1000 MHz / Cores: 2 / Jan 2011
AMD C-50

Summary

Reasons to consider AMD A6-9120C SoC

This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).
Higher theoretical single-threaded performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture.

Reasons to consider AMD C-50

None

No winner

Gaming

No clear winner declared


No winner

Productivity

No clear winner declared



Specifications

Features

AMD A6-9120C SoCAMD C-50
MMX
3DNow!
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSE4
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
SSE4A
AMD64
AES
AVX
AVX2
BMI1
BMI2
FMA3
FMA4
F16C
TBM
XOP
AMD-V
EVP
Turbo Core

Architecture

AMD A6-9120C SoCAMD C-50
ArchitectureAMD ExcavatorvsAMD Bobcat
MarketMobilevsMobile
Memory SupportDDR3vsunknown
CodenameStoney RidgevsOntario
Release DateJan 2019vsJan 2011

Cores

AMD A6-9120C SoCAMD C-50
Cores2vs2
Threads2vs2
SMPs1vs1
Integrated GraphicsRadeon R4vsRadeon HD 6250

Cache

AMD A6-9120C SoCAMD C-50
L1 Cache128K (per core)vs64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache1MB (per core)vs512 KB (per core)
L3 CacheN/Avs0 KB

Physical

AMD A6-9120C SoCAMD C-50
SocketAMD Socket FT4vsAMD Socket FT1
Max Case Temp74°Cvsunknown
PackageBGAvs
Die Size124mm²vs75mm²
Process28 nmvs40 nm

Performance

AMD A6-9120C SoCAMD C-50
Cpu Frequency1600 MHzvs1000 MHz
Turbo Clock2400 MHzvsnone
Base Clock100 MHzvs100 MHz
VoltageN/Avs1.35 V
TDP6 Wvs9 W

Raw performance index

Raw single-thread performance estimation

  • AMD A6-9120C SoC
    1656 points
  • AMD C-50
    1000 points

Points - higher is better

Raw multi-thread performance estimation

  • AMD A6-9120C SoC
    1920 points
  • AMD C-50
    2000 points

Points - higher is better