AMD A6-9120C SoC vs AMD C-50
Summary
Reasons to consider AMD A6-9120C SoC |
This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below). |
Higher theoretical single-threaded performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture. |
Reasons to consider AMD C-50 |
None |
Gaming
No clear winner declared
Productivity
No clear winner declared
Features
AMD A6-9120C SoC | | AMD C-50 | |
---|
MMX | | | |
3DNow! | | | |
SSE | | | |
SSE2 | | | |
SSE3 | | | |
SSE4 | | | |
SSE4.1 | | | |
SSE4.2 | | | |
SSE4A | | | |
AMD64 | | | |
AES | | | |
AVX | | | |
AVX2 | | | |
BMI1 | | | |
BMI2 | | | |
FMA3 | | | |
FMA4 | | | |
F16C | | | |
TBM | | | |
XOP | | | |
AMD-V | | | |
EVP | | | |
Turbo Core | | | |
| | | |
Architecture
| AMD A6-9120C SoC | | AMD C-50 | |
---|
Architecture | AMD Excavator | vs | AMD Bobcat |
Market | Mobile | vs | Mobile |
Memory Support | DDR3 | vs | unknown |
Codename | Stoney Ridge | vs | Ontario |
Release Date | Jan 2019 | vs | Jan 2011 |
Cores
| AMD A6-9120C SoC | | AMD C-50 | |
---|
Cores | 2 | vs | 2 |
Threads | 2 | vs | 2 |
SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 |
Integrated Graphics | Radeon R4 | vs | Radeon HD 6250 |
Cache
| AMD A6-9120C SoC | | AMD C-50 | |
---|
L1 Cache | 128K (per core) | vs | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 Cache | 1MB (per core) | vs | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 Cache | N/A | vs | 0 KB |
Physical
| AMD A6-9120C SoC | | AMD C-50 | |
---|
Socket | AMD Socket FT4 | vs | AMD Socket FT1 |
Max Case Temp | 74°C | vs | unknown |
Package | BGA | vs | |
Die Size | 124mm² | vs | 75mm² |
Process | 28 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Performance
| AMD A6-9120C SoC | | AMD C-50 | |
---|
Cpu Frequency | 1600 MHz | vs | 1000 MHz |
Turbo Clock | 2400 MHz | vs | none |
Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz |
Voltage | N/A | vs | 1.35 V |
TDP | 6 W | vs | 9 W |
AMD A6-9120C SoC
1656 points
AMD C-50
1000 points
Points - higher is better
AMD A6-9120C SoC
1920 points
AMD C-50
2000 points
Points - higher is better