AMD C-50 vs Intel Atom E3815

AMD C-50
AMD Socket FT1MOBILE
1000 MHz / Cores: 2 / Jan 2011
AMD C-50
Intel Atom E3815
Intel BGA1170MOBILE
1467 MHz / Cores: 1 / Oct 2013
Intel Atom E3815

Summary

Reasons to consider AMD C-50

Higher theoretical single-threaded performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture.
Higher theoretical multi-threaded performance, based on specifications plus core architecture.
Higher overall performance, based on specifications plus core architecture.

Reasons to consider Intel Atom E3815

This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).

AMD C-50

Gaming

HWBench recommends AMD C-50

Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.

AMD C-50

Productivity

HWBench recommends AMD C-50

Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.


Specifications

Features

AMD C-50Intel Atom E3815
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
EIST
XD bit
BPT
NX

Architecture

AMD C-50Intel Atom E3815
ArchitectureAMD BobcatvsIntel_Silvermont
MarketMobilevsMobile
Memory SupportunknownvsDDR3
CodenameOntariovsBay Trail-I
Release DateJan 2011vsOct 2013

Cores

AMD C-50Intel Atom E3815
Cores2vs1
Threads2vs1
SMPs1vs1
Integrated GraphicsRadeon HD 6250vsHD Graphics

Cache

AMD C-50Intel Atom E3815
L1 Cache64 KB (per core)vs64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache512 KB (per core)vs512 KB (per core)
L3 Cache0 KBvs0 KB

Physical

AMD C-50Intel Atom E3815
SocketAMD Socket FT1vsIntel BGA1170
Max Case Tempunknownvsunknown
PackagevsFC-BGA1170
Die Size75mm²vsunknown
Process40 nmvs22 nm

Performance

AMD C-50Intel Atom E3815
Cpu Frequency1000 MHzvs1467 MHz
Turbo Clocknonevsnone
Base Clock100 MHzvs133 MHz
Voltage1.35 Vvsunknown
TDP9 Wvs5 W

Raw performance index

Raw single-thread performance estimation

  • AMD C-50
    1000 points
  • Intel Atom E3815
    880 points

Points - higher is better

Raw multi-thread performance estimation

  • AMD C-50
    2000 points
  • Intel Atom E3815
    880 points

Points - higher is better