AMD E1-2150 vs Intel Celeron 847
Summary
Reasons to consider AMD E1-2150 |
This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below). |
Reasons to consider Intel Celeron 847 |
None |
Gaming
No clear winner declared
Productivity
No clear winner declared
Features
AMD E1-2150 | | Intel Celeron 847 | |
---|
MMX | | | |
3DNow! | | | |
SSE | | | |
SSE2 | | | |
SSE3 | | | |
SSE4A | | | |
SSE4.1 | | | |
SSE4.2 | | | |
AVX | | | |
AES | | | |
F16C | | | |
BMI1 | | | |
AMD64 | | | |
CnQ | | | |
NX bit | | | |
AMD-V | | | |
SSSE3 | | | |
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST) | | | |
Intel 64 | | | |
XD bit (an NX bit implementation) | | | |
Intel VT-x | | | |
Smart Cache. | | | |
Architecture
| AMD E1-2150 | | Intel Celeron 847 | |
---|
Architecture | AMD Jaguar | vs | Intel_SandyBridge |
Market | Mobile | vs | Mobile |
Memory Support | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 |
Codename | Kabini | vs | Sandy Bridge |
Release Date | Feb 2014 | vs | Jun 2011 |
Cores
| AMD E1-2150 | | Intel Celeron 847 | |
---|
Cores | 2 | vs | 2 |
Threads | 2 | vs | 2 |
SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 |
Integrated Graphics | Radeon HD 8210 | vs | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Cache
| AMD E1-2150 | | Intel Celeron 847 | |
---|
L1 Cache | 128 KB (per core) | vs | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | vs | 256 KB (per core) |
L3 Cache | 0 KB | vs | 2048 KB (shared) |
Physical
| AMD E1-2150 | | Intel Celeron 847 | |
---|
Socket | AMD Socket FT3 | vs | Intel BGA1023 |
Max Case Temp | 90°C | vs | unknown |
Package | BGA2 | vs | rPGA |
Die Size | 246mm² | vs | 131mm² |
Process | 32 nm | vs | 32 nm |
Performance
| AMD E1-2150 | | Intel Celeron 847 | |
---|
Cpu Frequency | 1050 MHz | vs | 1100 MHz |
Turbo Clock | none | vs | none |
Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz |
Voltage | 1.475 V | vs | unknown |
TDP | 9 W | vs | 17 W |
AMD E1-2150
1050 points
Intel Celeron 847
1100 points
Points - higher is better
AMD E1-2150
2100 points
Intel Celeron 847
2200 points
Points - higher is better