AMD E1-2150 vs Intel Celeron 847

AMD E1-2150
AMD Socket FT3MOBILE
1050 MHz / Cores: 2 / Feb 2014
AMD E1-2150
Intel Celeron 847
Intel BGA1023MOBILE
1100 MHz / Cores: 2 / Jun 2011
Intel Celeron 847

Summary

Reasons to consider AMD E1-2150

This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).

Reasons to consider Intel Celeron 847

None

No winner

Gaming

No clear winner declared


No winner

Productivity

No clear winner declared



Specifications

Features

AMD E1-2150Intel Celeron 847
MMX
3DNow!
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSE4A
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AVX
AES
F16C
BMI1
AMD64
CnQ
NX bit
AMD-V
SSSE3
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST)
Intel 64
XD bit (an NX bit implementation)
Intel VT-x
Smart Cache.

Architecture

AMD E1-2150Intel Celeron 847
ArchitectureAMD JaguarvsIntel_SandyBridge
MarketMobilevsMobile
Memory SupportDDR3vsDDR3
CodenameKabinivsSandy Bridge
Release DateFeb 2014vsJun 2011

Cores

AMD E1-2150Intel Celeron 847
Cores2vs2
Threads2vs2
SMPs1vs1
Integrated GraphicsRadeon HD 8210vsIntel HD (Sandy Bridge)

Cache

AMD E1-2150Intel Celeron 847
L1 Cache128 KB (per core)vs64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache512 KB (per core)vs256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache0 KBvs2048 KB (shared)

Physical

AMD E1-2150Intel Celeron 847
SocketAMD Socket FT3vsIntel BGA1023
Max Case Temp90°Cvsunknown
PackageBGA2vsrPGA
Die Size246mm²vs131mm²
Process32 nmvs32 nm

Performance

AMD E1-2150Intel Celeron 847
Cpu Frequency1050 MHzvs1100 MHz
Turbo Clocknonevsnone
Base Clock100 MHzvs100 MHz
Voltage1.475 Vvsunknown
TDP9 Wvs17 W

Raw performance index

Raw single-thread performance estimation

  • AMD E1-2150
    1050 points
  • Intel Celeron 847
    1100 points

Points - higher is better

Raw multi-thread performance estimation

  • AMD E1-2150
    2100 points
  • Intel Celeron 847
    2200 points

Points - higher is better