HWBench.com

    AMD E2-3000 vs Intel Celeron G465

    AMD E2-3000
    AMD Socket FT3MOBILE
    1650 MHz / Cores: 2 / May 2013
    AMD E2-3000
    Intel Celeron G465
    Intel Socket 1155DESKTOP
    1900 MHz / Cores: 1 / Sep 2012
    Intel Celeron G465

    Summary

    Synthetic performance index

    • AMD E2-3000
      100%
    • Intel Celeron G465
      145%

    Relative performance

    Single thread performance index

    • AMD E2-3000
      100%
    • Intel Celeron G465
      173%

    Relative performance

    Multi thread performance index

    • AMD E2-3000
      100%
    • Intel Celeron G465
      117%

    Relative performance

    Reasons to consider AMD E2-3000

    None

    Reasons to consider Intel Celeron G465

    Much higher single threaded performance (around 73% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications.
    17% higher multi threaded performance.
    Around 45% higher average synthetic performance.
    Intel Celeron G465

    Gaming

    HWBench recommends Intel Celeron G465

    Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
    No winner

    Productivity

    No clear winner declared

    Specifications

    Features

    AMD E2-3000Intel Celeron G465
    MMX
    3DNow!
    SSE
    SSE2
    SSE3
    SSE4A
    SSE4.1
    SSE4.2
    AVX
    AES
    F16C
    BMI1
    AMD64
    CnQ
    NX bit
    AMD-V
    SSSE3
    EIST
    Intel 64
    XD bit
    Intel VT-x
    Smart Cache

    Architecture

    AMD E2-3000Intel Celeron G465
    ArchitectureAMD JaguarvsIntel_SandyBridge
    MarketMobilevsDesktop
    Memory SupportDDR3vsDDR3
    CodenameKabinivsSandy Bridge
    Release DateMay 2013vsSep 2012

    Cores

    AMD E2-3000Intel Celeron G465
    Cores2vs1
    Threads2vs1
    SMPs1vs1
    Integrated GraphicsRadeon HD 8280vsIntel HD (Sandy Bridge)

    Cache

    AMD E2-3000Intel Celeron G465
    L1 Cache128 KB (per core)vs64 KB
    L2 Cache512 KB (per core)vs256 KB
    L3 Cache0 KBvs1536 KB

    Physical

    AMD E2-3000Intel Celeron G465
    SocketAMD Socket FT3vsIntel Socket 1155
    Max Case Temp90°Cvsunknown
    PackageBGA2vsFC-LGA10
    Die Size246mm²vs131mm²
    Process32 nmvs32 nm

    Performance

    AMD E2-3000Intel Celeron G465
    Cpu Frequency1650 MHzvs1900 MHz
    Turbo Clocknonevsnone
    Base Clock100 MHzvs100 MHz
    Voltage1.475 Vvsunknown
    TDP15 Wvs35 W

    Raw performance index

    Raw single-thread performance estimation

    • AMD E2-3000
      1650 points
    • Intel Celeron G465
      1900 points

    Points - higher is better

    Raw multi-thread performance estimation

    • AMD E2-3000
      3300 points
    • Intel Celeron G465
      1900 points

    Points - higher is better

    Synthetic benchmarks

    GeekBench 3 (32-bit Multi Core)

    • AMD E2-3000
      1499
    • Intel Celeron G465
      1545

    points - higher is better

    GeekBench 3 (32-bit Single Core)

    • AMD E2-3000
      867
    • Intel Celeron G465
      1271

    points - higher is better

    Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

    • AMD E2-3000 (simulated)
      31.35
    • Intel Celeron G465 (simulated)
      62.65

    points - higher is better

    Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

    • AMD E2-3000 (simulated)
      51.15
    • Intel Celeron G465 (simulated)
      67.65

    points - higher is better

    Similar comparisons

    AMD E2-3000VS AMD A6-9220C SoC
    AMD E2-3000AMD A6-9220C SoC
    AMD E2-3000VS Intel Core M-5Y10c
    AMD E2-3000Intel Core M-5Y10c
    Intel Celeron G465VS AMD A6-9220C SoC
    Intel Celeron G465AMD A6-9220C SoC
    Intel Celeron G465VS Intel Core M-5Y10c
    Intel Celeron G465Intel Core M-5Y10c
    AMD A6-9500EVS Intel Core M-5Y31
    AMD A6-9500EIntel Core M-5Y31
    Intel Core M-5Y31VS Intel Core M-5Y51
    Intel Core M-5Y31Intel Core M-5Y51