AMD FX-4100 vs AMD FX-4150
Summary
Reasons to consider AMD FX-4100 |
| None |
Reasons to consider AMD FX-4150 |
| Higher theoretical multi-threaded performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture. |
Gaming
No clear winner declared
Productivity
No clear winner declared
Features
| AMD FX-4100 | | AMD FX-4150 | |
|---|
| MMX | | | |
| SSE | | | |
| SSE2 | | | |
| SSE3 | | | |
| SSSE3 | | | |
| SSE4.1 | | | |
| SSE4.2 | | | |
| SSE4a | | | |
| AMD64 | | | |
| AMD-V | | | |
| AES | | | |
| AVX | | | |
| CLMUL | | | |
| CVT16 | | | |
| EVP | | | |
| FMA4 | | | |
| XOP | | | |
| Turbo Core | | | |
| HT3.1 | | | |
Architecture
| AMD FX-4100 | | AMD FX-4150 | |
|---|
| Architecture | AMD Bulldozer | vs | AMD Bulldozer |
| Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 |
| Codename | Zambezi | vs | Zambezi |
| Release Date | Oct 2011 | vs | Oct 2012 |
Cores
| AMD FX-4100 | | AMD FX-4150 | |
|---|
| Cores | 4 | vs | 4 |
| Threads | 4 | vs | 4 |
| SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 |
| Integrated Graphics | No | vs | No |
Cache
| AMD FX-4100 | | AMD FX-4150 | |
|---|
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | vs | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4096 KB | vs | 4096 KB |
| L3 Cache | 8192 KB (shared) | vs | 8192 KB (shared) |
Physical
| AMD FX-4100 | | AMD FX-4150 | |
|---|
| Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ | vs | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Max Case Temp | unknown | vs | unknown |
| Package | uPGA | vs | uPGA |
| Die Size | 315mm² | vs | 315mm² |
| Process | 32 nm | vs | 32 nm |
Performance
| AMD FX-4100 | | AMD FX-4150 | |
|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 3600 MHz | vs | 3800 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | 3900 MHz | vs | 4000 MHz |
| Base Clock | 200 MHz | vs | 200 MHz |
| Voltage | 1.425 V | vs | 1.425 V |
| TDP | 95 W | vs | 95 W |
AMD FX-4100
2301 points
AMD FX-4150
2360 points
Points - higher is better
AMD FX-4100
6966 points
AMD FX-4150
7353 points
Points - higher is better