AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Summary
Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
60 watts lower power draw. |
Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
Much higher multi threaded performance (around 35% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking. |
Around 19% higher average synthetic performance. |
Gaming
HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | |
---|
MMX | | | |
3DNow! | | | |
SSE | | | |
SSE2 | | | |
SSE3 | | | |
SSE4A | | | |
AMD64 | | | |
CnQ | | | |
NX bit | | | |
AMD-V | | | |
SMT | | | |
XFR | | | |
Architecture
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | |
---|
Architecture | AMD Zen+ | vs | AMD Zen |
Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop |
Memory Support | DDR4 | vs | DDR4 |
Codename | Zen | vs | Zen |
Release Date | Mar 2018 | vs | Aug 2017 |
Cores
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | |
---|
Cores | 6 | vs | 8 |
Threads | 12 | vs | 16 |
SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 |
Integrated Graphics | No | vs | No |
Cache
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | |
---|
L1 Cache | 96 KB (per core) | vs | 96 KB (per core) |
L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | vs | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 Cache | 16384 KB (shared) | vs | 32768 KB |
Physical
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | |
---|
Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | vs | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Max Case Temp | unknown | vs | unknown |
Package | uPGA | vs | uPGA |
Die Size | 192mm² | vs | 384mm² |
Process | 14 nm | vs | 14 nm |
Performance
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | |
---|
Cpu Frequency | 3400 MHz | vs | 3800 MHz |
Turbo Clock | 3900 MHz | vs | 4000 MHz |
Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz |
Voltage | unknown | vs | variable |
TDP | 65 W | vs | 125 W |
Points - higher is better
Points - higher is better
points - higher is better
points - higher is better