AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Xeon E5-2690

AMD Ryzen 5 2600
AMD Socket AM4DESKTOP
3400 MHz / Cores: 6 / Mar 2018
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Xeon E5-2690
Intel Socket 2011SERVER
2900 MHz / Cores: 8 / Mar 2012
Intel Xeon E5-2690

Summary

Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 5 2600

70 watts lower power draw.
This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).
Higher theoretical single-threaded performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture.

Reasons to consider Intel Xeon E5-2690

None

No winner

Gaming

No clear winner declared


No winner

Productivity

No clear winner declared



Specifications

Features

AMD Ryzen 5 2600Intel Xeon E5-2690
MMX
3DNow!
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSE4A
AMD64
CnQ
NX bit
AMD-V
SMT
SSSE3
SSE4.2
AVX
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
TXT
Intel VT-x
Intel VT-d
Hyper-Threading
AES-NI
8.0GT/s QPI

Architecture

AMD Ryzen 5 2600Intel Xeon E5-2690
ArchitectureAMD Zen+vsIntel_SandyBridge
MarketDesktopvsServer
Memory SupportDDR4vsDDR3
CodenameZenvsSandy Bridge-EP
Release DateMar 2018vsMar 2012

Cores

AMD Ryzen 5 2600Intel Xeon E5-2690
Cores6vs8
Threads12vs16
SMPs1vs2
Integrated GraphicsNovsNo

Cache

AMD Ryzen 5 2600Intel Xeon E5-2690
L1 Cache96 KB (per core)vs64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache512 KB (per core)vs256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache16384 KB (shared)vs20480 KB (shared)

Physical

AMD Ryzen 5 2600Intel Xeon E5-2690
SocketAMD Socket AM4vsIntel Socket 2011
Max Case Tempunknownvsunknown
PackageuPGAvsFC-LGA10
Die Size192mm²vs435mm²
Process14 nmvs32 nm

Performance

AMD Ryzen 5 2600Intel Xeon E5-2690
Cpu Frequency3400 MHzvs2900 MHz
Turbo Clock3900 MHzvs3800 MHz
Base Clock100 MHzvs100 MHz
Voltageunknownvs1.35 V
TDP65 Wvs135 W

Raw performance index

Raw single-thread performance estimation

  • AMD Ryzen 5 2600
    4290 points
  • Intel Xeon E5-2690
    3800 points

Points - higher is better

Raw multi-thread performance estimation

  • AMD Ryzen 5 2600
    27376 points
  • Intel Xeon E5-2690
    27840 points

Points - higher is better