AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Summary
Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary |
None |
Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
10% higher single threaded performance. |
16% higher multi threaded performance. |
40 watts lower power draw. |
Around 13% higher average synthetic performance. |
Gaming
HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
No clear winner declared
Features
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary | | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | |
---|
MMX | | | |
SSE | | | |
SSE2 | | | |
SSE3 | | | |
SSSE3 | | | |
SSE4A | | | |
SSE4.1 | | | |
SSE4.2 | | | |
AES | | | |
AVX | | | |
AVX2 | | | |
BMI1 | | | |
BMI2 | | | |
SHA | | | |
F16C | | | |
FMA3 | | | |
AMD64 | | | |
EVP | | | |
AMD-V | | | |
SMAP | | | |
SMEP | | | |
SMT | | | |
Precision Boost 2 | | | |
XFR 2 | | | |
Architecture
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary | | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | |
---|
Architecture | AMD Zen+ | vs | AMD Zen 2 |
Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop |
Memory Support | DDR4
Dual-channel | vs | DDR4 |
Codename | Zen | vs | Zen 2 |
Release Date | Apr 2019 | vs | Dec 2019 |
Cores
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary | | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | |
---|
Cores | 8 | vs | 8 |
Threads | 16 | vs | 16 |
SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 |
Integrated Graphics | No | vs | No |
Cache
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary | | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | |
---|
L1 Cache | 96K (per core) | vs | 96K (per core) |
L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | vs | 512K (per core) |
L3 Cache | 16MB (shared) | vs | 32MB |
Physical
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary | | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | |
---|
Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | vs | AMD Socket AM4 |
Max Case Temp | N/A | vs | unknown |
Package | µOPGA-1331 | vs | |
Die Size | 192mm² | vs | unknown |
Process | 12 nm | vs | 7 nm |
Performance
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary | | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | |
---|
Cpu Frequency | 3700 MHz | vs | 3600 MHz |
Turbo Clock | 4350 MHz | vs | 4400 MHz |
Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz |
Voltage | N/A | vs | variable |
TDP | 105 W | vs | 65 W |
Points - higher is better
Points - higher is better
points - higher is better
points - higher is better