AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Summary
Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
Much higher multi threaded performance (around 268% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking. |
Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
155 watts lower power draw. |
Gaming
No clear winner declared
Productivity
HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | |
---|
MMX | | | |
SSE | | | |
SSE2 | | | |
SSE3 | | | |
SSSE3 | | | |
SSE4A | | | |
SSE4.1 | | | |
SSE4.2 | | | |
AES | | | |
AVX | | | |
AVX2 | | | |
BMI1 | | | |
BMI2 | | | |
SHA | | | |
F16C | | | |
FMA3 | | | |
AMD64 | | | |
EVP | | | |
AMD-V | | | |
SMAP | | | |
SMEP | | | |
SMT | | | |
Precision Boost 2 | | | |
XFR 2 | | | |
Architecture
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | |
---|
Architecture | AMD Zen 2 | vs | AMD Zen 2 |
Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop |
Memory Support | DDR4-3200 MHz
Quad-channel | vs | DDR4 |
Codename | Matisse | vs | Zen 2 |
Release Date | Feb 2020 | vs | Dec 2019 |
Cores
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | |
---|
Cores | 64 | vs | 12 |
Threads | 128 | vs | 24 |
SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 |
Integrated Graphics | No | vs | No |
Cache
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | |
---|
L1 Cache | 96K (per core) | vs | 96K (per core) |
L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | vs | 512K (per core) |
L3 Cache | 128MB | vs | 64MB |
Physical
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | |
---|
Socket | AMD Socket TR4 | vs | AMD Socket AM4 |
Max Case Temp | 95°C | vs | unknown |
Package | sTRX4 | vs | |
Die Size | 74mm² | vs | unknown |
Process | 7 nm | vs | 7 nm |
Performance
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | |
---|
Cpu Frequency | 2900 MHz | vs | 3800 MHz |
Turbo Clock | 4300 MHz | vs | 4600 MHz |
Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz |
Voltage | N/A | vs | variable |
TDP | 280 W | vs | 125 W |
Points - higher is better
Points - higher is better
points - higher is better
points - higher is better