Intel Celeron G1610 vs Intel Pentium G3220
Summary
Intel Celeron G1610
100%
Intel Pentium G3220
123%
Relative performance
Intel Celeron G1610
100%
Intel Pentium G3220
122%
Relative performance
Intel Celeron G1610
100%
Intel Pentium G3220
124%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider Intel Celeron G1610 |
None |
Reasons to consider Intel Pentium G3220 |
Much higher single threaded performance (around 22% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications. |
Much higher multi threaded performance (around 24% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking. |
Around 23% higher average synthetic performance. |
Gaming
HWBench recommends Intel Pentium G3220
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWBench recommends Intel Pentium G3220
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
Intel Celeron G1610 | | Intel Pentium G3220 | |
---|
MMX | | | |
SSE | | | |
SSE2 | | | |
SSE3 | | | |
SSSE3 | | | |
SSE4.2 | | | |
AVX | | | |
EIST | | | |
Intel 64 | | | |
XD bit | | | |
VT-x | | | |
CLMUL | | | |
FMA3 | | | |
Architecture
| Intel Celeron G1610 | | Intel Pentium G3220 | |
---|
Architecture | Intel_IvyBridge | vs | Intel_Haswell |
Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop |
Memory Support | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 |
Codename | Ivy Bridge | vs | Haswell |
Release Date | Dec 2012 | vs | Sep 2013 |
Cores
| Intel Celeron G1610 | | Intel Pentium G3220 | |
---|
Cores | 2 | vs | 2 |
Threads | 2 | vs | 2 |
SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 |
Integrated Graphics | Intel HD | vs | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Cache
| Intel Celeron G1610 | | Intel Pentium G3220 | |
---|
L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | vs | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | vs | 256 KB (per core) |
L3 Cache | 2048 KB (shared) | vs | 3072 KB (shared) |
Physical
| Intel Celeron G1610 | | Intel Pentium G3220 | |
---|
Socket | Intel Socket 1155 | vs | Intel Socket 1150 |
Max Case Temp | 65°C | vs | 72°C |
Package | FC-LGA12C | vs | FC-LGA12C |
Die Size | 94mm² | vs | 177mm² |
Process | 22 nm | vs | 22 nm |
Performance
| Intel Celeron G1610 | | Intel Pentium G3220 | |
---|
Cpu Frequency | 2600 MHz | vs | 3000 MHz |
Turbo Clock | none | vs | none |
Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz |
Voltage | unknown | vs | unknown |
TDP | 55 W | vs | 54 W |
Intel Celeron G1610
2678 points
Intel Pentium G3220
3360 points
Points - higher is better
Intel Celeron G1610
5356 points
Intel Pentium G3220
6720 points
Points - higher is better
Intel Celeron G1610
3498
Intel Pentium G3220
4272
points - higher is better
Intel Celeron G1610
2070
Intel Pentium G3220
2603
points - higher is better
Intel Celeron G1610
3686
Intel Pentium G3220
4702
points - higher is better
Intel Celeron G1610
2002
Intel Pentium G3220
2402
points - higher is better