Intel Celeron G3900 vs AMD FX-4300
Summary
Intel Celeron G3900
106%
AMD FX-4300
100%
Relative performance
Intel Celeron G3900
138%
AMD FX-4300
100%
Relative performance
Intel Celeron G3900
100%
AMD FX-4300
133%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider Intel Celeron G3900 |
| Much higher single threaded performance (around 38% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications. |
| 44 watts lower power draw. |
| This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below). |
| Has an integrated GPU, which allows to run the system without a dedicated graphics card, unlike the AMD FX-4300. |
Reasons to consider AMD FX-4300 |
| Much higher multi threaded performance (around 33% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking. |
Gaming
No clear winner declared
Productivity
HWBench recommends AMD FX-4300
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
| Intel Celeron G3900 | | AMD FX-4300 | |
|---|
| MMX | | | |
| SSE | | | |
| SSE2 | | | |
| SSE3 | | | |
| SSSE3 | | | |
| SSE4.1 | | | |
| SSE4.2 | | | |
| AVX | | | |
| AVX2 | | | |
| EIST | | | |
| Intel 64 | | | |
| XD bit | | | |
| VT-x | | | |
| AES-NI | | | |
| TSX | | | |
| CLMUL | | | |
| FMA3 | | | |
| SSE4a | | | |
| AMD64 | | | |
| AMD-V | | | |
| AES | | | |
| CVT16 | | | |
| EVP | | | |
| FMA4 | | | |
| XOP | | | |
| Turbo Core | | | |
| HT3.1 | | | |
Architecture
| Intel Celeron G3900 | | AMD FX-4300 | |
|---|
| Architecture | Intel_Kabylake | vs | AMD Piledriver |
| Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR3, DDR4 | vs | DDR3 |
| Codename | Skylake | vs | Vishera |
| Release Date | Sep 2015 | vs | Oct 2012 |
Cores
| Intel Celeron G3900 | | AMD FX-4300 | |
|---|
| Cores | 2 | vs | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | vs | 4 |
| SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 | vs | No |
Cache
| Intel Celeron G3900 | | AMD FX-4300 | |
|---|
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | vs | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | vs | 4096 KB |
| L3 Cache | 4096 KB (shared) | vs | 8192 KB (shared) |
Physical
| Intel Celeron G3900 | | AMD FX-4300 | |
|---|
| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | vs | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Max Case Temp | 65°C | vs | unknown |
| Package | | vs | uPGA |
| Die Size | 150mm² | vs | 315mm² |
| Process | 14 nm | vs | 32 nm |
Performance
| Intel Celeron G3900 | | AMD FX-4300 | |
|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 2800 MHz | vs | 3800 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | none | vs | 4000 MHz |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 200 MHz |
| Voltage | unknown | vs | 1.425 V |
| TDP | 51 W | vs | 95 W |
Intel Celeron G3900
3360 points
AMD FX-4300
2440 points
Points - higher is better
Intel Celeron G3900
6720 points
AMD FX-4300
7603 points
Points - higher is better
Intel Celeron G3900
227
AMD FX-4300 (simulated)
302.15
points - higher is better
points - higher is better