Intel Core i5-2500K vs Intel Core i7-2700K

Intel Core i5-2500K
Intel Socket 1155DESKTOP
3300 MHz / Cores: 4 / Jan 2011
Intel Core i5-2500K
Intel Core i7-2700K
Intel Socket 1155DESKTOP
3500 MHz / Cores: 4 / Oct 2011
Intel Core i7-2700K

Summary

Synthetic performance index

  • Intel Core i5-2500K
    100%
  • Intel Core i7-2700K
    118%

Relative performance

Single thread performance index

  • Intel Core i5-2500K
    100%
  • Intel Core i7-2700K
    105%

Relative performance

Multi thread performance index

  • Intel Core i5-2500K
    100%
  • Intel Core i7-2700K
    128%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider Intel Core i5-2500K

None

Reasons to consider Intel Core i7-2700K

5% higher single threaded performance.
Much higher multi threaded performance (around 28% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking.
Around 18% higher average synthetic performance.

Intel Core i7-2700K

Gaming

HWBench recommends Intel Core i7-2700K

Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.

Intel Core i7-2700K

Productivity

HWBench recommends Intel Core i7-2700K

Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.


Specifications

Features

Intel Core i5-2500KIntel Core i7-2700K
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4.2
AVX
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
AES-NI
Hyper-Threading

Architecture

Intel Core i5-2500KIntel Core i7-2700K
ArchitectureIntel_SandyBridgevsIntel_SandyBridge
MarketDesktopvsDesktop
Memory SupportDDR3vsDDR3
CodenameSandy BridgevsSandy Bridge
Release DateJan 2011vsOct 2011

Cores

Intel Core i5-2500KIntel Core i7-2700K
Cores4vs4
Threads4vs8
SMPs1vs1
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 3000vsIntel HD 3000

Cache

Intel Core i5-2500KIntel Core i7-2700K
L1 Cache64 KB (per core)vs64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache256 KB (per core)vs256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache6144 KB (shared)vs8192 KB (shared)

Physical

Intel Core i5-2500KIntel Core i7-2700K
SocketIntel Socket 1155vsIntel Socket 1155
Max Case Tempunknownvsunknown
PackageFC-LGA10vsFC-LGA10
Die Size216mm²vs216mm²
Process32 nmvs32 nm

Performance

Intel Core i5-2500KIntel Core i7-2700K
Cpu Frequency3300 MHzvs3500 MHz
Turbo Clock3700 MHzvs3900 MHz
Base Clock100 MHzvs100 MHz
Voltageunknownvsunknown
TDP95 Wvs95 W

Raw performance index

Raw single-thread performance estimation

  • Intel Core i5-2500K
    3700 points
  • Intel Core i7-2700K
    3900 points

Points - higher is better

Raw multi-thread performance estimation

  • Intel Core i5-2500K
    13200 points
  • Intel Core i7-2700K
    16800 points

Points - higher is better

Synthetic benchmarks

GeekBench 3 (32-bit Multi Core)

  • Intel Core i5-2500K
    10235
  • Intel Core i7-2700K
    13115

points - higher is better

GeekBench 3 (64-bit Single Core)

  • Intel Core i5-2500K
    3486
  • Intel Core i7-2700K
    3578

points - higher is better

GeekBench 3 (64-bit Multi Core)

  • Intel Core i5-2500K
    11233
  • Intel Core i7-2700K
    13982

points - higher is better

GeekBench 3 (32-bit Single Core)

  • Intel Core i5-2500K
    3215
  • Intel Core i7-2700K
    3334

points - higher is better

3DMark06 CPU

  • Intel Core i5-2500K
    5853
  • Intel Core i7-2700K
    6837

points - higher is better

Cinebench R10 32Bit Single

  • Intel Core i5-2500K
    4773
  • Intel Core i7-2700K
    4967

points - higher is better

Cinebench R10 32Bit Multi

  • Intel Core i5-2500K
    15956
  • Intel Core i7-2700K
    19675

points - higher is better

Cinebench R11.5 64Bit

  • Intel Core i5-2500K
    5.38
  • Intel Core i7-2700K
    7

points - higher is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

  • Intel Core i5-2500K
    122
  • Intel Core i7-2700K (simulated)
    132.39

points - higher is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

  • Intel Core i5-2500K
    470
  • Intel Core i7-2700K (simulated)
    632.06

points - higher is better

SuperPI 1M

  • Intel Core i5-2500K
    10.8
  • Intel Core i7-2700K
    9.84

seconds - lower is better

wPrime 32

  • Intel Core i5-2500K
    11.67
  • Intel Core i7-2700K
    7.15

seconds - lower is better