GeForce 210 vs GeForce 310 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce 210 |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider GeForce 310 OEM |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| GeForce 210 | | GeForce 310 OEM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GT218 (GT218-300-B1) | vs | GT218 (GT218-300-A2) |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 57 mm² | vs | 57 mm² |
| Transistors | 260 million | vs | 260 million |
| Shaders | 16 | vs | 16 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 520 MHz | vs | 589 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce 210 | | GeForce 310 OEM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | DDR2 |
| Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | 400 MHz
800 MHz effective | vs | 333 MHz
666 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 512 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce 210 | | GeForce 310 OEM | |
|---|
| TDP | 31 watts | vs | 31 watts |
| Release Date | 12 Oct 2009 | vs | 27 Nov 2009 |
GeForce 210
2.08 GP/s
GeForce 310 OEM
2.36 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce 210
4.16 GT/s
GeForce 310 OEM
4.71 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce 210
6.40 GB/s
GeForce 310 OEM
5.33 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce 210
39.36 GFLOPs
GeForce 310 OEM
44.86 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better