GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs GeForce GT 610 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 610 OEM |
Supports PhysX |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 | | GeForce GT 610 OEM | |
---|
GPU Name | GT218 (GT218-670-B1) | vs | GF119 (GF119 B1) |
Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 57 mm² | vs | 79 mm² |
Transistors | 260 million | vs | 292 million |
Shaders | 16 | vs | 48 |
Compute Units | 2 | vs | 2 |
Core clock | 589 MHz | vs | 550 MHz |
ROPs | 4 | vs | 4 |
TMUs | 8 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 | | GeForce GT 610 OEM | |
---|
Memory Type | DDR2 | vs | DDR3 |
Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 64 bit |
Memory Speed | 600 MHz
1200 MHz effective | vs | 500 MHz
1000 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 128 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 | | GeForce GT 610 OEM | |
---|
TDP | 50 watts | vs | 29 watts |
Release Date | 13 Jun 2012 | vs | 9 Sep 2012 |
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
2.36 GP/s
GeForce GT 610 OEM
2.20 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
4.71 GT/s
GeForce GT 610 OEM
4.40 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
9.60 GB/s
GeForce GT 610 OEM
8.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
44.86 GFLOPs
GeForce GT 610 OEM
115.20 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better