Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200) vs GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200) |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Reasons to consider GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200) | | GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Mullins () | vs | GT218 (GT218-670-B1) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 57 mm² |
| Transistors | unknown | vs | 260 million |
| Shaders | 128 | vs | 16 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 267 MHz | vs | 589 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200) | | GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | DDR2 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 600 MHz
1200 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 128 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200) | | GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 | |
|---|
| TDP | 15 watts | vs | 50 watts |
| Release Date | 28 Jan 2015 | vs | 13 Jun 2012 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better