Radeon HD 7310 IGP vs GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 7310 IGP |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 7310 IGP | | GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Loveland () | vs | GT218 (GT218-670-B1) |
| Fab Process | 32 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 75 mm² | vs | 57 mm² |
| Transistors | 75 million | vs | 260 million |
| Shaders | 80 | vs | 16 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 500 MHz | vs | 589 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 7310 IGP | | GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | DDR2 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 600 MHz
1200 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 128 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 7310 IGP | | GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 | |
|---|
| TDP | 18 watts | vs | 50 watts |
| Release Date | 6 Jun 2012 | vs | 13 Jun 2012 |
Radeon HD 7310 IGP
2.00 GP/s
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
2.36 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 7310 IGP
4.00 GT/s
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
4.71 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 7310 IGP
0.00 GB/s
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
9.60 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 7310 IGP
80.00 GFLOPs
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
44.86 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better