GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition vs Radeon R5 230
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider Radeon R5 230 |
76 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition . |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition | | Radeon R5 230 | |
---|
GPU Name | G94 (G94-300-A1) | vs | Caicos (Caicos PRO) |
Fab Process | 65 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 240 mm² | vs | 67 mm² |
Transistors | 505 million | vs | 370 million |
Shaders | 64 | vs | 160 |
Compute Units | 4 | vs | 2 |
Core clock | 600 MHz | vs | 625 MHz |
ROPs | 16 | vs | 4 |
TMUs | 32 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition | | Radeon R5 230 | |
---|
Memory Type | DDR2 | vs | DDR3 |
Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 64 bit |
Memory Speed | 266 MHz
532 MHz effective | vs | 667 MHz
1334 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition | | Radeon R5 230 | |
---|
TDP | 95 watts | vs | 19 watts |
Release Date | 22 Dec 2008 | vs | 3 Apr 2014 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better