GeForce GT 220 vs GeForce GT 420 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 220 |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 420 OEM |
Supports PhysX |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GT 220 | | GeForce GT 420 OEM | |
---|
GPU Name | G94 () | vs | GF108 (GF108-200-A1) |
Fab Process | 65 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 240 mm² | vs | 116 mm² |
Transistors | 505 million | vs | 585 million |
Shaders | 48 | vs | 48 |
Compute Units | 2 | vs | 1 |
Core clock | 600 MHz | vs | 700 MHz |
ROPs | 16 | vs | 4 |
TMUs | 24 | vs | 4 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GT 220 | | GeForce GT 420 OEM | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR3 | vs | DDR3 |
Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit |
Memory Speed | 700 MHz
1400 MHz effective | vs | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 1048 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GT 220 | | GeForce GT 420 OEM | |
---|
TDP | 58 watts | vs | 50 watts |
Release Date | 26 Jan 2010 | vs | 3 Sep 2010 |
GeForce GT 220
9.60 GP/s
GeForce GT 420 OEM
1.40 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GT 220
14.40 GT/s
GeForce GT 420 OEM
2.80 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GT 220
44.80 GB/s
GeForce GT 420 OEM
28.80 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GT 220
144.00 GFLOPs
GeForce GT 420 OEM
134.40 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better