GeForce GT 630 vs Radeon R5 220 OEM

GeForce GT 630
Memory: 1024Mb DDR3DESKTOP
Release date: 15 May 2012
GeForce GT 630
Radeon R5 220 OEM
Memory: 1024Mb DDR3DESKTOP
Release date: 21 Dec 2013
Radeon R5 220 OEM

Summary

Reasons to consider GeForce GT 630

Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.
Supports PhysX
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Reasons to consider Radeon R5 220 OEM

46 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GT 630 .
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications

GeForce GT 630

HWBench recommends GeForce GT 630

Based on theoretical specifications.


Specifications

Core Configuration

GeForce GT 630Radeon R5 220 OEM
GPU NameGF108 (GF108-400-A1)vsCedar (Cedar PRO)
Fab Process40 nmvs40 nm
Die Size116 mm²vs59 mm²
Transistors585 millionvs292 million
Shaders96vs80
Compute Units2vs2
Core clock810 MHzvs650 MHz
ROPs4vs4
TMUs16vs8

Memory Configuration

GeForce GT 630Radeon R5 220 OEM
Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR3
Bus Width128 bitvs64 bit
Memory Speed900 MHz
1800 MHz effective
vs533 MHz
1066 MHz effective
Memory Size1024 Mbvs1024 Mb

Additional details

GeForce GT 630Radeon R5 220 OEM
TDP65 wattsvs19 watts
Release Date15 May 2012vs21 Dec 2013

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • GeForce GT 630
    3.24 GP/s
  • Radeon R5 220 OEM
    2.60 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • GeForce GT 630
    13.00 GT/s
  • Radeon R5 220 OEM
    5.20 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • GeForce GT 630
    28.80 GB/s
  • Radeon R5 220 OEM
    8.53 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • GeForce GT 630
    311.00 GFLOPs
  • Radeon R5 220 OEM
    104.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better