GeForce GTX 1650 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1650 |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
| Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 1650
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1650 | | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | TU107 () | vs | Broadwell GT3e () |
| Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 14 nm |
| Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 49 mm² |
| Transistors | unknown | vs | 189 million |
| Shaders | 896 | vs | 384 |
| Compute Units | 14 | vs | 0 |
| Core clock | 1485 MHz | vs | 300 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | vs | 6 |
| TMUs | 56 | vs | 48 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1650 | | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | System Shared |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | System Shared |
| Memory Speed | 2000 MHz
8000 MHz effective | vs | System Shared |
| Memory Size | 4096 Mb | vs | 0 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 1650 | | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
|---|
| TDP | 0 watts | vs | 15 watts |
| Release Date | 30 Apr 2019 | vs | 5 Sep 2014 |
GeForce GTX 1650
53.28 GP/s
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
1.80 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1650
93.24 GT/s
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
14.40 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1650
128.00 GB/s
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
0.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1650
2984.00 GFLOPs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
230.40 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better