GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Radeon R9 390X
Summary
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
100%
Radeon R9 390X
76%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
| 23% higher gaming performance. |
| 150 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon R9 390X . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R9 390X |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports FreeSync |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports TrueAudio |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (13 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | | Radeon R9 390X | |
|---|
| GPU Name | TU116 (TU116-300-A1) | vs | Grenada (Grenada XT) |
| Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 284 mm² | vs | 438 mm² |
| Transistors | 6,600 million | vs | 6,200 million |
| Shaders | 1408 | vs | 2816 |
| Compute Units | 22 | vs | 44 |
| Core clock | 1530 MHz | vs | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | vs | 64 |
| TMUs | 88 | vs | 176 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | | Radeon R9 390X | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192 bit | vs | 512 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1750 MHz
14000 MHz effective | vs | 1500 MHz
6000 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 6144 Mb | vs | 8192 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | | Radeon R9 390X | |
|---|
| TDP | 125 watts | vs | 275 watts |
| Release Date | 29 Oct 2019 | vs | 18 Jun 2015 |
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
85.68 GP/s
Radeon R9 390X
67.20 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
157.10 GT/s
Radeon R9 390X
184.80 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
336.00 GB/s
Radeon R9 390X
384.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
5020.00 GFLOPs
Radeon R9 390X
5914.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
90
Radeon R9 390X
75
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
102
Radeon R9 390X
80
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
46
Radeon R9 390X
35
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
80
Radeon R9 390X
56
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
68
Radeon R9 390X
56
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
70
Radeon R9 390X
59
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
35
Radeon R9 390X
29
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
51
Radeon R9 390X
38
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
32
Radeon R9 390X
33
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
38
Radeon R9 390X
33
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
21
Radeon R9 390X
19
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
25
Radeon R9 390X
20
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
42
Radeon R9 390X
-1
FPS (higher is better)