GeForce GTX 260 vs GeForce GTS 240 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 260 |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTS 240 OEM |
62 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 260 . |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 260
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 260 | | GeForce GTS 240 OEM | |
---|
GPU Name | GT200 (G200-100-A2) | vs | G92B (G92-240-B1) |
Fab Process | 65 nm | vs | 55 nm |
Die Size | 576 mm² | vs | 260 mm² |
Transistors | 1,400 million | vs | 754 million |
Shaders | 192 | vs | 112 |
Compute Units | 8 | vs | 7 |
Core clock | 576 MHz | vs | 675 MHz |
ROPs | 28 | vs | 16 |
TMUs | 64 | vs | 56 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 260 | | GeForce GTS 240 OEM | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR3 | vs | GDDR3 |
Bus Width | 448 bit | vs | 256 bit |
Memory Speed | 999 MHz
1998 MHz effective | vs | 1100 MHz
2200 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 896 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 260 | | GeForce GTS 240 OEM | |
---|
TDP | 182 watts | vs | 120 watts |
Release Date | 16 Jun 2008 | vs | 1 Jul 2009 |
GeForce GTX 260
16.10 GP/s
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
10.80 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 260
36.90 GT/s
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
37.80 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 260
112.00 GB/s
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
70.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GTX 260
476.90 GFLOPs
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
362.90 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better