GeForce GTX 260 vs GeForce GTX 750
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 260 |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 750 |
127 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 260 . |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 750
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 260 | | GeForce GTX 750 | |
---|
GPU Name | GT200 (G200-100-A2) | vs | GM107 (GM107-300-A2) |
Fab Process | 65 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Die Size | 576 mm² | vs | 148 mm² |
Transistors | 1,400 million | vs | 1,870 million |
Shaders | 192 | vs | 512 |
Compute Units | 8 | vs | 4 |
Core clock | 576 MHz | vs | 1020 MHz |
ROPs | 28 | vs | 16 |
TMUs | 64 | vs | 32 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 260 | | GeForce GTX 750 | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR3 | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | 448 bit | vs | 128 bit |
Memory Speed | 999 MHz
1998 MHz effective | vs | 1253 MHz
5012 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 896 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 260 | | GeForce GTX 750 | |
---|
TDP | 182 watts | vs | 55 watts |
Release Date | 16 Jun 2008 | vs | 18 Feb 2014 |
GeForce GTX 260
16.10 GP/s
GeForce GTX 750
16.32 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 260
36.90 GT/s
GeForce GTX 750
32.60 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 260
112.00 GB/s
GeForce GTX 750
80.20 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GTX 260
476.90 GFLOPs
GeForce GTX 750
1044.50 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better