GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal) vs GeForce GT 520
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal) |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Around 6914% higher average synthetic performance. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 520 |
| 221 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal) . |
| Supports PhysX |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal)
The GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal) is the better performing card based on the synthetic benchmarks used (1 benchmarks).
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal) | | GeForce GT 520 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GP102 (GP102) | vs | GF119 (GF119-300-A1) |
| Fab Process | 16 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 471 mm² | vs | 79 mm² |
| Transistors | 12,000 million | vs | 292 million |
| Shaders | 3584 | vs | 48 |
| Compute Units | 28 | vs | 1 |
| Core clock | 1417 MHz | vs | 810 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 224 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal) | | GeForce GT 520 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | 384 bit | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1251 MHz
10008 MHz effective | vs | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 12288 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal) | | GeForce GT 520 | |
|---|
| TDP | 250 watts | vs | 29 watts |
| Release Date | 2 Aug 2016 | vs | 13 Apr 2011 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better
Points (higher is better)