GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs Radeon HD 2400
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 2400 |
70 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB . |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB | | Radeon HD 2400 | |
---|
GPU Name | GA106 (GA106-140-A1) | vs | RV610 () |
Fab Process | 8 nm | vs | 65 nm |
Die Size | 276 mm² | vs | 85 mm² |
Transistors | 13,250 million | vs | 180 million |
Shaders | 2304 | vs | 40 |
Compute Units | 18 | vs | 2 |
Core clock | 1545 MHz | vs | 398 MHz |
ROPs | 40 | vs | 4 |
TMUs | 72 | vs | 4 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB | | Radeon HD 2400 | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | DDR2 |
Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 64 bit |
Memory Speed | 1750 MHz
14 Gbps effective | vs | 495 MHz
990 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 4096 Mb | vs | 256 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB | | Radeon HD 2400 | |
---|
TDP | 90 watts | vs | 20 watts |
Release Date | 27 Jan 2022 | vs | 19 Feb 2008 |
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
69.60 GP/s
Radeon HD 2400
1.59 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
125.30 GT/s
Radeon HD 2400
1.59 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
224.00 GB/s
Radeon HD 2400
7.92 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
8018.00 GFLOPs
Radeon HD 2400
31.84 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better