GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs GeForce 210
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
| Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider GeForce 210 |
| 99 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB . |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB | | GeForce 210 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GA106 (GA106-150-A1) | vs | GT218 (GT218-300-B1) |
| Fab Process | 8 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 276 mm² | vs | 57 mm² |
| Transistors | 13,250 million | vs | 260 million |
| Shaders | 2560 | vs | 16 |
| Compute Units | 20 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 1552 MHz | vs | 520 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 80 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB | | GeForce 210 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1750 MHz
14 Gbps effective | vs | 400 MHz
800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 8192 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB | | GeForce 210 | |
|---|
| TDP | 130 watts | vs | 31 watts |
| Release Date | 4 Jan 2022 | vs | 12 Oct 2009 |
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
85.30 GP/s
GeForce 210
2.08 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
142.20 GT/s
GeForce 210
4.16 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
224.00 GB/s
GeForce 210
6.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
9098.00 GFLOPs
GeForce 210
39.36 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better