Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 260
Summary
Reasons to consider Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
| 137 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 260 . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 260 |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | | GeForce GTX 260 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Haswell GT3e () | vs | GT200 (G200-100-A2) |
| Fab Process | 22 nm | vs | 65 nm |
| Die Size | 177 mm² | vs | 576 mm² |
| Transistors | 392 million | vs | 1,400 million |
| Shaders | 40 | vs | 192 |
| Compute Units | 0 | vs | 8 |
| Core clock | 200 MHz | vs | 576 MHz |
| ROPs | 2 | vs | 28 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 64 |
Memory Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | | GeForce GTX 260 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 448 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 999 MHz
1998 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 896 Mb |
Additional details
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | | GeForce GTX 260 | |
|---|
| TDP | 45 watts | vs | 182 watts |
| Release Date | 3 Jun 2013 | vs | 16 Jun 2008 |
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
10.40 GP/s
GeForce GTX 260
16.10 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
20.80 GT/s
GeForce GTX 260
36.90 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
0.00 GB/s
GeForce GTX 260
112.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
832.00 GFLOPs
GeForce GTX 260
476.90 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better