Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 970
Summary
Reasons to consider Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
| 103 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 970 . |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 970 |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 970
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | | GeForce GTX 970 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Haswell GT3e () | vs | GM204 (GM204-200-A1) |
| Fab Process | 22 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 177 mm² | vs | 398 mm² |
| Transistors | 392 million | vs | 5,200 million |
| Shaders | 40 | vs | 1664 |
| Compute Units | 0 | vs | 13 |
| Core clock | 200 MHz | vs | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 2 | vs | 56 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 104 |
Memory Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | | GeForce GTX 970 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 256 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 1753 MHz
7012 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 4096 Mb |
Additional details
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | | GeForce GTX 970 | |
|---|
| TDP | 45 watts | vs | 148 watts |
| Release Date | 3 Jun 2013 | vs | 19 Sep 2014 |
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
10.40 GP/s
GeForce GTX 970
58.80 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
20.80 GT/s
GeForce GTX 970
109.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
0.00 GB/s
GeForce GTX 970
224.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
832.00 GFLOPs
GeForce GTX 970
3494.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better