Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce GTX 285

Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 5 Sep 2014
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GeForce GTX 285
Memory: 1024Mb GDDR3DESKTOP
Release date: 23 Dec 2008
GeForce GTX 285


Reasons to consider Iris Pro Graphics 6200

189 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 285 .
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 285

Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor

GeForce GTX 285

HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 285

Based on theoretical specifications.


Core Configuration

Iris Pro Graphics 6200GeForce GTX 285
GPU NameBroadwell GT3e ()vsGT200B (G200-350-B3)
Fab Process14 nmvs55 nm
Die Size49 mm²vs470 mm²
Transistors189 millionvs1,400 million
Compute Units0vs10
Core clock300 MHzvs648 MHz

Memory Configuration

Iris Pro Graphics 6200GeForce GTX 285
Memory TypeSystem SharedvsGDDR3
Bus WidthSystem Sharedvs512 bit
Memory SpeedSystem Sharedvs1242 MHz
2484 MHz effective
Memory Size0 Mbvs1024 Mb

Additional details

Iris Pro Graphics 6200GeForce GTX 285
TDP15 wattsvs204 watts
Release Date5 Sep 2014vs23 Dec 2008

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    1.80 GP/s
  • GeForce GTX 285
    20.70 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    14.40 GT/s
  • GeForce GTX 285
    51.80 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    0.00 GB/s
  • GeForce GTX 285
    159.00 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    230.40 GFLOPs
  • GeForce GTX 285
    708.50 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better