Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition
Summary
Reasons to consider Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
285 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition . |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Mantle |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | | Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition | |
---|
GPU Name | Broadwell GT3e () | vs | Tahiti (Tahiti XT2) |
Fab Process | 14 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Die Size | 49 mm² | vs | 352 mm² |
Transistors | 189 million | vs | 4,313 million |
Shaders | 384 | vs | 2048 |
Compute Units | 0 | vs | 32 |
Core clock | 300 MHz | vs | 1000 MHz |
ROPs | 6 | vs | 32 |
TMUs | 48 | vs | 128 |
Memory Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | | Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition | |
---|
Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 384 bit |
Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 1500 MHz
6000 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 3072 Mb |
Additional details
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | | Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition | |
---|
TDP | 15 watts | vs | 300 watts |
Release Date | 5 Sep 2014 | vs | 22 Jun 2012 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better